SwisStep

SWISSTEP / KNOWLEDGE LIBRARY

Websites and data sources

Primary literature, clinical protocols, reusable datasets and tools for movement research.

Use these resources to locate primary evidence, choose a recognised protocol or find data for a reproducible analysis. Access and reuse conditions belong to each provider; check the licence and cite the specific dataset version or publication you use.

Editorial relevance
Literature index

PubMed

Search original biomedical publications by population, outcome and study design. Follow the publication link for the full methods and check corrections and retractions.

Visit PubMed →

Editorial relevance
Clinical instruments

Rehabilitation Measures Database

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab’s collection of clinical instruments and measurement-property summaries helps compare protocols and population-specific evidence.

Visit Rehabilitation Measures Database →

Editorial relevance
Digital mobility data

Mobilise-D

Find the consortium’s data resources and associated methods for digital mobility outcomes. Review release-specific access terms, protocols and cohort definitions.

Visit Mobilise-D →

Editorial relevance
Open dataset

PhysioNet: Gait in Parkinson’s Disease

Under-foot force recordings from 93 participants with Parkinson’s disease and 73 controls. A useful resource for gait-signal research; it is not a smartphone-IMU collection.

Visit PhysioNet: Gait in Parkinson’s Disease →

Editorial relevance
Public-health protocols

CDC STEADI

Clinical tools for older-adult falls assessment and prevention, connecting mobility measures to a multifactorial approach.

Visit CDC STEADI →

Editorial relevance
Trial registry

ClinicalTrials.gov

Examine registered protocols, planned outcomes and reported results. Registration describes a study; it does not establish a positive result or validate a device.

Visit ClinicalTrials.gov →

Editorial relevance
Validation resources

Digital Medicine Society

Use its validation resources to identify measurement questions and supporting literature. Review the original publication for every claim used in an endpoint strategy.

Visit Digital Medicine Society →

Editorial relevance
Modelling tools

OpenSim / SimTK

Explore musculoskeletal modelling software and associated research resources. Model-based estimates depend on assumptions and require validation for the task.

Visit OpenSim / SimTK →

Editorial relevance
Provider research

OneStep research and resources

A recommended provider resource for smartphone gait-monitoring research, clinical workflows and practical discussions. Distinguish published evidence from company-authored guidance.

Visit OneStep research and resources →

Editorial relevance
Professional society

International Society of Biomechanics

Find community, standards-related resources and educational material for biomechanics research. Check the scope and publication date of each recommendation.

Visit International Society of Biomechanics →

Editorial relevance
Background reference

Gait analysis on Wikipedia

A broad orientation to terminology and measurement approaches. For a clinical or scientific claim, follow through to the original cited research.

Visit Gait analysis on Wikipedia →

Illustration and source credits

The walking sequence, metric illustrations and velocity chart were created for SwisStep with OpenAI image generation. The gait player and protocol diagrams are original explanatory graphics. They depict concepts, not recorded patient trajectories. The velocity chart reproduces the published group means cited beside it; numerical values are also available in accessible text.

Organization logos and site marks belong to their respective owners. They are used to identify the organizations associated with linked research or products, without alteration or a claim of affiliation. Publisher marks identify the publisher, not necessarily the authors’ institutions.

How to use the ratings and topic labels

Stars indicate editorial relevance to clinicians and researchers using this library: 5 = foundational or broadly applicable; 4 = directly useful for a defined question; 3 = specialist or emerging application; 2 = indirect relevance; 1 = background context. They are not journal impact factors, evidence-certainty grades, product comparisons or estimates of clinical benefit. Lists place higher-relevance entries first; chronological steps and test protocols retain their required sequence. Topic labels use the same colors throughout the library, with text identifying every subject.

PAtch login

The platform login address is awaiting configuration. This website does not collect your password.