Walking speed
Distance divided by time. Summarises pace and supports standardised longitudinal assessment.
Report units, timed distance and start procedure. Keep instructions and walking aids consistent between assessments.

SWISSTEP / KNOWLEDGE LIBRARY
Illustrated gait parameters, standard clinical tests and a structured approach to evaluating measurement evidence.
Define the population, setting and intended decision before choosing a metric. Validity concerns the quantity you claim to measure; reliability concerns repeatability; agreement concerns absolute differences between methods. A measure can be reliable and still systematically biased. V3 evaluation framework.
Distance divided by time. Summarises pace and supports standardised longitudinal assessment.
Report units, timed distance and start procedure. Keep instructions and walking aids consistent between assessments.
Steps per minute. Helps explain whether pace changes through stepping frequency.
Count steps, not strides, and state the observation interval. Interpret alongside step or stride length rather than treating cadence as an isolated quality score.
Distance between successive contacts of the same foot. Describes spatial progression and complements cadence.
Specify the contact event, units and whether values were normalised to body dimensions. Do not confuse step length with stride length.
Time with both feet in contact. Describes temporal support strategy; interpret alongside speed.
State whether you report seconds or percentage of cycle. Compare like walking conditions; duration varies with speed and support strategy.
A specified left–right difference. Can track an unequal pattern and its response to rehabilitation.
Report the metric, equation, sign and denominator. Different asymmetry formulas cannot be compared as if they were the same quantity.
Dispersion across steps or strides. Describes consistency that an average can conceal.
Report the number of strides, walking-bout selection and whether turns were included; sensor error can inflate apparent variability.
Amount and distribution of everyday walking. Complements capacity by describing real-world participation.
Nonwear cannot be interpreted as zero movement. Record valid observation time and the rules used to identify a walking bout.
Task-specific transition and postural measures. Adds information about mobility beyond straight walking.
Use a named protocol and appropriate reference. A walking score alone does not replace balance and falls assessment.
These summaries support test selection and interpretation. Use the linked instrument instructions for administration and scoring. Each small diagram is an original visual summary, not a substitute for the protocol.
A short, standardised assessment of walking speed. Specify comfortable or fast pace, the timed distance and whether the start is static or moving. Different published protocols use different acceleration and deceleration arrangements; report the exact version rather than silently pooling them.
Administration and reporting. Measure the specified distance and divide it by elapsed time to obtain m/s. Record the walking aid and assistance. Repeat with the same instructions and layout when assessing change.
Interpretation. A difference can reflect protocol variation as well as recovery. Consult population-specific repeatability and change estimates; do not transfer a threshold between diagnoses without evidence.
A functional mobility sequence: rise from a chair, walk 3 metres, turn, return and sit. Total time integrates transfers, walking and turning, so two patients with the same time may have different limitations.
Administration and reporting. Use a consistent chair, footwear, aid and instruction. Instrumented versions can separate components, but their event definitions and validation need reporting alongside the total time.
Interpretation. Observe how the task is completed, not just how quickly. A single time threshold cannot provide a complete fall-risk assessment.
A standardised timed-distance test used to assess sustained walking capacity. The endpoint is distance covered over six minutes, with protocol-defined instructions and monitoring.
Administration and reporting. Record course length, turns, rests, encouragement, aid and relevant symptoms. Follow the applicable clinical protocol, including eligibility and stopping criteria, rather than treating a daily walking app as an equivalent test.
Interpretation. Repeat testing may be influenced by learning and by course layout. Interpret change with evidence for the diagnosis and test conditions.
The FGA examines postural stability while walking under changing task demands. Its 10 items extend assessment beyond comfortable straight-line walking, including more challenging locomotor tasks.
Administration and reporting. Items are scored from 0 to 3, for a maximum of 30. Use the published instructions and scoring criteria. The total is an ordinal clinical score, not a physical unit.
Interpretation. Consider floor and ceiling effects and population-specific measurement properties. Sensor-derived parameters can complement the assessment but are not automatically equivalent to its score.
The Berg Balance Scale samples balance through 14 functional tasks. It provides a structured clinical view of task performance rather than continuous gait monitoring.
Administration and reporting. Use the instrument’s task instructions and scoring criteria; the maximum total is 56. Record assistance and conditions so repeated assessments are interpretable.
Interpretation. Choose it for the population and construct it addresses. Static or functional balance performance does not encompass every challenge encountered during walking.
Repeated sit-to-stand performance provides information about lower-limb functional strength. It complements walking measures in an older-adult falls assessment.
Administration and reporting. Follow the CDC protocol for chair setup, arm position and counting completed stands within 30 seconds. Record inability to perform the task under the specified conditions.
Interpretation. Changing the chair height or using the arms changes the task. Interpretation should use the appropriate reference, not a single universal cutoff.
A progressive standing assessment examines the ability to hold increasingly challenging foot positions. It addresses balance under a defined task rather than movement exposure throughout the day.
Administration and reporting. Follow the CDC sequence and timing, with the prescribed support and safety procedures. Document the stage achieved and the duration maintained.
Interpretation. Do not substitute an unsupervised animation or wearable score for administration of the clinical test. Combine findings with other falls-assessment domains.